vir savarkar

Vinayak Damodar 'Veer' Savarkar is back in the news, 38 years after he passed into the ages.
The late champion of Hindutva returned to the headlines when Petroleum Minister Mani Shankar Aiyar [ Images ] recently ordered the removal of a plaque with a message by Savarkar from the historical Cellular Jail on the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
Aiyar also criticised Savarkar, leading to the Shiv Sena [ Images ] and Bharatiya Janata Party [ Images ] in Maharashtra demanding an apology from the Congress MP.
Who was Veer Savarkar? What was his role in India's freedom movement? Why is he so controversial? We present a primer on the controversial revolutionary.
Who was he?
Savarkar (1883 to 1966) was a revolutionary who spent many years in prison in the Andamans. He propounded the philosophy of Hindutva and was linked to Mahatma Gandhi's [ Images ] assassination, but was not found guilty.
What was his early life like?
He was born on May 28, 1883, in Bhagpur village near Nashik. After his parents died young, his elder brother Ganesh looked after the family.
In 1898, the British hanged the Chapekar brothers in Pune for killing a British officer. This had a deep impact on the teenaged Savarkar, who decided to take up armed struggle against the British.
In 1901, he joined the Ferguson College in Pune and set up the Abhinav Bharat Society, which preached a revolutionary struggle against the British.
He also won a scholarship that took him to Britain to study law in 1906.
Did he not write a book on the First War of Independence?
In Britain, Savarkar organised students and advocated an armed struggle to throw the British out of India. He also wrote his book on the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny, which he called India's First War of Independence, a terminology the Indian government accepted after Independence.
Since there was no question of printing the book in Britain, it was printed in Holland and copies of it were smuggled into India.
The book was a huge success, giving Indians a strong sense of pride, providing a fresh perspective on a war that was till then merely seen as the outcome of disgruntled Indian soldiers in the service of the British.
The second edition was published by Indians in the US while Bhagat Singh printed the third edition.
Its translations were a big success: the Punjabi and Urdu translations traveled far and wide while the Tamil translation almost becoming mandatory reading for soldiers of Subhas Chandra Bose's Indian National Army -- a majority of who were Tamilians from Southeast Asia.
When was he arrested?
In Britain, he also created a network of like-minded individuals. Given his anti-British activities, the police soon came looking for him.
He was arrested in London [ Images ] on March 13, 1910 and sent to India to face trial.
Didn't he escape from the ship?
The story that made Savarkar a national hero!
The ship in which he was being taken to India berthed at Marseilles, France [ Images ], on July 8, 1910.
Savarkar wriggled out of the porthole and swam a great distance in the cold water to reach the shore.
He had earlier told his friends, including Madame Bhikaji Cama, to meet him at Marseilles, but they arrived late and the British recaptured him.
Since Savarkar did not speak French, he was unable to tell the local policeman that he was a refugee. Even though he could not escape, this story resonated across India.
He was tried, and on December 24, 1910, sentenced to 50 years in prison.
On July 4, 1911, he was sent to Port Blair's Cellular Jail.
50 years! That must have been very tough.
It certainly was. Savarkar's supporters always point to his incredibly difficult and degrading days in jail, sentenced to rigorous imprisonment when he was in the prime of life; placed in solitary confinement while other leaders had it much easier and were released whenever their health failed or someone in the family fell ill.
Savarkar enjoyed no such luxury.
How long was he in prison?
In 1920, Vithalbhai Patel -- Vallabhbhai Patel's elder brother -- demanded Savarkar's release, a demand also backed by Gandhi and Nehru.
On May 2, 1921, Savarkar was shifted from the Cellular Jail, first to the Alipore Jail in Bengal and then to Ratnagiri Jail in western Maharashtra.
He was released on January 6, 1924 on the condition that he would not leave Ratnagiri district, which is not very far from Mumbai [ Images ] (then Bombay), till 1937.
Why did the British release him from prison?
Up to this point, most historians regardless of ideology would agree that Savarkar was a committed revolutionary, even if one does not support the notion of an armed struggle.
But from the point of his release from jail, Savarkar becomes a divided figure, either loved or loathed.
Savarkar agreed he would abstain from political activities to facilitate his release.
His supporters say he only made such promises to get out of prison and that he remained committed to throwing the British out of India.
What did he do on getting out of jail?
He became active in the Hindu Mahasabha, founded in 1915, which sought to protect the interests of Hindus.
The Hindu Mahasabha, which differed radically from the Indian National Congress, attracted followers who were either opposed to Gandhi and the Congress, or believed in Hindutva.
It is not clear why Savarkar joined the Mahasabha, though given his dislike for non-violence and his assurance to the British, joining the Congress was out of question.
So he became a champion for Hindutva?
Savarkar, who popularised the term 'First War of Independence', also coined the term Hindutva when he wrote an eponymous book.
The book outlined the features of Hindutva, including its economic, social, and political aspects.
He also wrote another book in English, Hindupadpadshahi, extolling the Maratha rule over India.
He had developed and expounded the notion of one nation, one culture, bound by blood and race. In 1937, he became president of the Hindu Mahasabha, and remained in the post till 1943.
Is it true he did not support the Quit India movement?
The Hindu Mahasabha, under Savarkar's presidency, did not support the Quit India movement launched in August 1942.
Savarkar also asked Hindus to help the British in their war effort against Germany [ Images ] and Japan [ Images ].
His supporters say this was a tactic to get more Hindus to pick up military training that could have been turned against the British later.
He was not alone. The Communist Party of India and Muslim League also did not support the Quit India movement.
Was Savarkar linked to Gandhi's assassination?
Nathuram Godse and Narayan Apte, the two main accused, were known to Savarkar and frequently visited him.
After Gandhi's assassination, mobs stoned Savarkar's home in Bombay, where he had shifted to from Ratnagiri.
Savarkar was arrested, but he alone was set free for lack of evidence.
Savarkar's supporters deny any link to the Mahatma's assassination, insisting that Godse and Apte acted on their own.
What is his legacy?
For his supporters, Savarkar believed in a strong Hindu society and in the Hindutva ideology of one nation, one culture, one people, which meant no special provisions for any minority.
For his opponents, this ideology divides India today by trying to deny the minorities a rightful place in Indian society.
As the bitter political battle over Aiyar's decision reveals, the controversy over Veer Savarkar's legacy is far from concluded.
Image: Rahil Shaikh
Amberish K Diwanji in New Delhi

K A M D H E N U PROJECT


Aims and Objectives
To start a business, which gives Social upliftment to masses, and which has plenty profit to give the project, a chain reaction, so that it can be multiplied 1000 times.

The hidden idea is that, if we can become instrumental in helping people physically, they will be in a better position to appreciate the finer things of life, that is Krishna Consciousness.

And this whole project is guided by the basic principal, that , if we can be Krishna’s tool, in helping the “brijwasees” and the Cows, Krishna would be much pleased.

Name of the business
Dairy development and Milk Powder Plant.

Why Dairy ?
Milk is a complex biological fluid consisting of fats, proteins, minerals, vitamins, enzymes, lactose and water. Not only is milk a highly nutritious food, it is also a functional ingredient. However, sometimes it is difficult to transport, store or even formulate with milk in its fluid form. Therefore, processors employ technologies to remove the majority of water from fluid milk, which results in milk powder. The most common milk powders are Skim Milk Powder, Whole Milk Powder and Buttermilk Powder.

Why milk powder ?
Milk powders contribute nutritionally, functionally and economically to a variety of food formulations including bakery, confectionery, dairy, recombined milk, meat, nutritional beverages, and prepared foods.

Milk powders are milk products with an extended shelf life. By removing the majority of moisture from milk, fluid milk is transposed into a shelf-stable dry powder with a shelf life of up to 18 months, as compared to fluid milk's 18-day shelf life.

What is chain reaction ?
This term is taken from the atomic fission. Here it means that the profits are enough to start another two or more projects of the same type. And those two will give to another four. That too in a short time.

What are the profit centres of the project ?
There are two profit centres. First from the milk powder plant. Second from the dairy industry ( taking care of the cows in the farm).

Any precedence of this business ?
Already similar projects are a great success in Gujrat and many other parts of India. For example AMUL.

Any competition ?
Actually this product is for international market and domestic too. And at both places there is acute shortage. And since the production cost in other countries is more, we always have a competitive advantage.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Actual financial implications :
This project will be called as KAMDHENU project. Means “Riches through COWS”
This has three distinct styles.
A. Gopi :
10 separate milk farms of 1000 cows in each. The typical cash flow for one farm would be as follows, with the local variations.
Fixed long term cost for one dairy :
Cost of 1000 cows
110 lacks

Cost of land
100 lacks
At many places we get a lot of land at very cheap price, from local authorities, for dairy purpose.
Cost of shed
50 lacks

Cost of transport
20 lacks

Miscellaneous
10 lacks

Total long term cost excluding land & cows
80 lacks
Land and cow cost is taken out as both do not have a depreciation factor.
Regular costs :
Cattle feed for one month
10 lakh

Man power cost ,
5 lakhs

TOTAL regular cost / m
15 lakh / month
180 lakh /year
Profit loss statement ;
Milk earning @15 per liter X 10,000 liter
1.5 lakh / day =
45 Lakh per month
540 lakh /yr
Regular expenses


180 lakh / yr
Gross profit per dairy


3.60 crores/mnth/dairy
Gross Profit for 10 dairies


36 crores/yr
B. GOPAL project :
Surrounding every Gopi Project, there would be a gopal project, where, the local villagers would be given one to as many cows, as they can keep, on loan basis. Which would be recovered from their earnings of milk.
So for example a house hold which keeps 10 cows, then they would be having profits like this
Earnings from 10 cows daily =
100 liters x 15 =
1500 daily =
45,000 monthly
Expenses on cow, feed etc. =


10,000
Return of loan amount


5,000
Gross earnings for one household


30,000 monthly

C. Balram Project (milk powder plant) of capacity one lac litre per day.
This will produce only ghee and milk powder, for the wholesale market, and export, which is readily sellable , always.
Cost of Plant =
20- crores

Cost of land (5 hectare) =
5 crores
(of course this will appreciate double and ten times, as soon as such type of activity starts.)
GROSS profit per day
@ rs 5 per liter =
5 lak per day = 1.5 crore per month = 18 crore per year.
Other benefits :
1. Every village household will earn good, so there living standard would be high.
2. Indian children and people get nutritious food.
3. enough bulls for farming and transport.
4. we have not taken into account the energy farming by gobar gas plants. Each cow produces the gas equivalent to 225 liter of petrol in one year. Based on that calculation, if we can make just one such project per district, we will not require any petrol import.
5. the outcome of the gobar gas plant is the best fertilizer in the world. We have not taken here into the account the earnings from that. And this would end all the fertilizer import which is second biggest import after petrol by now.
6. It is shame for us that a small country of 40 lakh population (new Zealand) produces 3 times the milk powder then 110 crore people of India, in the country of Krishna , just because we have left this project in the hands of government.
7. with even these facts, India is today the largest producer of the Milk in world, and fourth largest exporter of the milk powder.. we just have to make it first, which is so easily possible, because of all the favorable conditions in Indian climate and people.
8. for any further queries or suggestions, feel free to call gashok34@yahoo.com. Or 22162671 or 9810890743.

Controversey surrounds Rahul Gandhi’s MPhil

2009 April 15
by ideopreneur
Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi
The Congress party on Thursday served a legal notice to The New Indian Express for publishing what it called “wild allegations and sly insinuations” on the educational qualifications of party General Secretary Rahul Gandhi.
“Deeply distressed by your wild allegations, sly insinuations and self-serving innuendos, all premised on complete falsehoods and steeped in malice, a notice is being issued,” party spokesman Abhishek Singhvi told reporters at the AICC headquarters in the capital.
Singhvi quoted a letter from the University, which stated that Gandhi was a student at the institution as a member of the Trinity College from October 1994 to July 1995 and was awarded an M Phil in Development Studies in 1995.
Earlier, Rahul had also said in a press conference that he will serve a legal notice to the newspaper for writing the article.
Below is the article that the Chennai based newspaper published. Will keep you updated on any further developments on the issue.
(The article, dateline Chennai, was published in The New Indian Express on April 7, 2009. It has been reproduced here with proper permission)
Truth about Rahul Gandhi’s MPhil
Rahul Gandhi appears to have been economical with the truth on his affidavit while filing his election nomination papers in Amethi this weekend.
In the affidavit, he states that he obtained an MPhil from Trinity College of the University of Cambridge, UK, in 1995, in Developmental Economics. A certificate from the University shows that not only has he got dates wrong, he has even got the name of the course he took incorrect.
Worse, the man touted as a future prime minister failed one of his four papers.
Rahul got 58 percent in “National Economic Planning and Policy” (according to the grading scale given in the certificate, 60 percent is the minimum for a pass).
The certificate, shown alongside, was issued a year ago by Diana Kazemi, the secretary of the department of Development Studies (and not Developmental Economics) in which Rahul Gandhi studied.
He enrolled under the name ‘Raul Vinci’, a pseudonym given by the British authorities in a common practice as there are a good number of VVIP wards from around the world enrolled at British educational institutions. The pseudonym came to light during the 2004 elections in the Telegraph and the Hindu.
According to the University, Rahul read for the MPhil in 2004- 05, and not in 1994-95, as stated in his affidavit.
His affidavit’s other claim, to have obtained his Bachelors from Rollins College in Florida, USA, is true (and is a departure from earlier claims by ’supporters’ that he graduated from Harvard). He also briefly attended St Stephen’s College in Delhi, gaining admission through the sports quota.
His mother (and Congress president) Sonia Gandhi was also in a minor controversy in 2004 over her educational qualifications.
Her nomination papers’ affidavit claimed she obtained a certificate in English from Lennox Cook School, University of Cambridge, in 1965. After it was revealed that the school had no affiliation to the University, Sonia claimed that the error on the affidavit was the result of a secretarial typing mistake.
http://canarytrap.wordpress.com/2009/04/15/truth-about-rahul-gandhi’s-mphil/

to be hindu /muslim / atheist

Why I am Happy without a Religion :
following is a conversation on the site of islam-watch.org
http://www.islam-watch.org/iw-new/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=74:why-i-am-happy-without-a-religion&catid=65:khan&Itemid=58#JOSC_TOP
A recent conversation with a Hindu reader on what I feel about the existence of the god and why I feel satisfied about living my life without having a religion...
Recently Mr. Gupta, a reader from Delhi, having landed on our site, found it “eye opening” and wondered how could we continue running this site, without being attacked or murdered by the Jihadis. He ended the email querying:
What is the alternative? Is Hinduism is a possible alternative?
In response I wrote:
This site is based in the West and we it anonymously. So, we can escape the sword of Jihadis.
Islam is obviously softening down. Another 'Satanic Verses' or Muhammad's cartoon would not raise the same uproar as it did in the first time. Every time it's repeated, Muslim's reaction would become softer. That's how 'freedom expression' works toward civilizing humanity.
Concerning alternative to Islam, we run this site from an atheistic standpoint, and we are quite happy with that. Muslims are leaving Islam, thanks to many efforts like ours. Many of them becoming atheists like us, other spiritualist, some joining other faiths: Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism etc.
Our observation suggests that Muslims of the subcontinent, when they leave Islam, become more respectful of Hinduism, simply because it's their civilizational religion. But they are not joining it in large numbers as full believers for the salvation of their soul or whatsoever.
However, we are not concerned about that. Our campaign is that Muslim leave Islam in the first place. Under any other category—believer of nonbeliever—they will obviously be more peaceful and productive. That’s all that count and important.MA Khan
It turned out that Mr. Gupta is an enlightened Hindu. He wrote back the following response:
I appreciate your have courage to follow the truth whatever the price is for it. Till yesterday, you were a Muslim, and you were with them. But when you find that they are not true to what they say and what they believe and what they actually do, then you had enough courage to leave them. And today you are a true atheist.
As a born Hindu, I was like you, and like rest of 99.99% Hindu public, who do not know what actually Hinduism is all about.
Yesterday, I had a false ego that anybody, who is not a Hindu, is a traitor, misguided and low-minded person. But today after going a little bit in my books and learned people, I have learned that all human are equal. And unless they harm others in thought and practice, it is O.K. with them and us. But if they do harm the others, they should be stopped, as much as you can.
I believe that there is a power which controls everything: we name it God, ishwar, allah or nature. Since I trust you to be a truthful person, I want some reflection from you on this matter.
Please write me, what do you think about it? Is there such a power or personality, which is super human? We may call it by any name. And it is not a property of any group of people. It belongs to every creature on this earth. Does something like this exists, or not.
Or you think, this world is by chance or unknown principles, which we need not to worry. But then in this case, this world would be all a result of unknown combination of unplanned acts, and ‘being good to others’ would be again an institution just to benefit the so-called already benefiting republics, and institution. They just want this system to run like this, irrespective of whatever they believe or not.
I know what you are doing: making a site, effective writing, showing light to others, itself means that you are a believer of the institution ‘be good to others, without believing in god’.
I wish you all the success in your aim, goal and mission.
I replied:
Concerning your query about a superpower god controlling the universe, it's all our guess. There is no evidence for that. If we feel that the universe cannot come to existence without a creator, the creator himself cannot come into being without the hand of a higher creator... That way we end up in an infinite hierarchy of creators with no end.
On this ground, I am happy to be an atheist. And even if a god exist, I don't think he cares at all what we do or how we live our life. If he is the supreme creator and everything is under his control, then whatever we do, good or bad, is also under his control; he guides us into doing those. We can't be punished by him for that.
Most of all, the cultic establishments and rituals, as innumerable as they are and have been, that surround the institution of god, are obviously of no use to an all-powerful and self-sufficient creator. Humans are the most intelligent of creatures of the Mother Nature. They can the most stupid, superstitious and irrational too, and have created all these wasteful edifices of immense cost.
To my observation, humans, whether religious and nonreligious, are capable of doing, indeed do, good and bad things. And of course, religions have added to miseries to humanity too. History, past or present, is a testimony to that.
As an atheist and a rationalist, I think humans are capable of creating their own good ethical standards by applying their thinking ability rationally. Even what have been passed on as religious or revealed from god, are all basically human creations; nothing ever fell from the sky or heaven. If we study the society in historical context, we find that even the allegedly revealed creeds—like Judaism, Christianity or Islam—basically incorporated humanity's already accumulated social and cultural traditions, customs and ethical values: all these were combined together and passed on as revealed from the heaven. Those prophets created hardly anything new and value-adding to humanity, and certainly not civilization changing.
While humanity will never have perfect a society, indeed there's no such thing as 'perfect', because the standard of 'perfect' continues evolving as society evolves—still we can create a good society by following the teachings of sages like Socrates, who taught that we must live an ethical life, just because it is our responsibility for being a rational creation of nature. In his teachings, there was no divine 'will' or 'command' to do so, or no reward from god to be reaped for living the ethical life. Humans must live good life as part of her/his human responsibility; and also because, it makes one feel good. By harming others, one will never feel good about it; by doing good to others, one certainly will. Living a good ethical life was in the interest of ones own good and happiness and fulfilling one’s responsibility as the rational and ethical creature of nature.
MA Khan
Mr. Gupta replied saying that he would love one day to do something like our effort at islam-watch.org, but directed at the religion of his birth, Hinduism. He mentioned that 'islam-watch' was an inspiration for him to undertake his own mission.
[The conversation slightly edited]

humour in Politics

The Hindu
Online edition of India's National NewspaperSunday, July 22, 2001

Features Previous Next
Humour in politics
IT is, of course, never seemly for a columnist to say, "I told you so". But I trust regular readers will recall my assertion in a May column that, as far as political humour is concerned, our national cupboard is bare. The Indian nationalist leaders and the politicians who followed them were in general, I suggested, a pretty humourless lot. Arguing that from what we know of them, our politicians have less reason than most to take themselves seriously, I conceded that "perhaps it is I who am uninformed; maybe there are examples of great Indian political humour that I have overlooked. If so, I would be happy to be enlightened. Readers are welcome to send me examples, care of this newspaper."
The response - a dozen letters and postcards, half a dozen emails - can hardly be described as overwhelming, but since I had offered to reproduce the best ones in a future column, I am glad to keep faith with the readers who have written in and do just that today. But I must warn you that I am obliged to conclude that my basic thesis still stands.
Dr. K.E. Eapen of Bangalore recalls that former Prime Minister V. P. Singh once entered Parliament without his usual fur cap (no doubt during the brief period when Maneka Gandhi had persuaded him that it symbolised cruelty to animals). Questioned about this by an opposition member, the former PM shot back, "what is important is not the cap but what is under it."
Dr. Eapen also recalls V. K. Krishna Menon's riposte when upbraided for his Ambassadorial Rolls-Royce in London: "I can scarcely hire a bullock-cart to call on 10 Downing Street." The sharp-tongued Krishna Menon is a particular favourite of Malayali readers. Advocate P.S. Leelakrishnan of Quilandy in Kerala reminds me of Menon's cutting comment when American arms aid to Pakistan was described as not being directed at India: "I am yet to come across a vegetarian tiger."
Speaking of Krishna Menon, my late father, Chandran Tharoor, who knew him well in London, often used to recall the acerbic nationalist's retort when complimented by a well-meaning Englishwoman on the quality of his English. "My English, Madam," he said to the hapless lady, Brigid Brophy, "is better than yours. You merely picked it up: I learned it."
Getting back to Parliamentary humour, V. Ramachandran of Kancheepuram offers a line whose author he cannot recall. During a debate on the Indian automobile industry, an Opposition member declared, "The only part of an Indian car which does not make a noise is the horn." Full marks for wit but not, I believe (given the deafening klaxons that were always an integral part of Indian traffic jams) for accuracy.
Mr. Leelakrishnan also justly upbraids me for omitting Sarojini Naidu from my earlier column. Her classic comment about the Mahtama's frugal lifestyle and his army of aides - "if only he knew how much it costs us to keep him in poverty" - is of course one of the great one-liners of the nationalist movement. Mr. Leelakrishnan also ascribes to her a crack about Sardar Patel: "the only culture he knows is agriculture". I had heard the line before, but was unaware it had been spoken in a political context, nor indeed that the Sardar was its intended victim.
In my column, I had asked for the Indian equivalents of the great political wisecracks of other democracies, recalling some instances of the savagely cutting humour that punctuates the British parliamentary tradition. Again it is Mr. Leelakrishnan who offers me the only example worth citing.
When Panampilly Govinda Menon was Chief Minister of Travancore- Cochin (the forerunner of Kerala State) in the early 1950s, he pointed to the Chief Minister's chair in the Assembly and told the ambitious leader of the Opposition, T. V. Thomas: "for you to sit in this chair you will have to be reborn as a bug".
To the remaining readers who have written in, my thanks but (as Groucho Marx used to say) no cigar. What is funny is, of course, a subjective matter, but V.R. Krishna Iyer calling Pattom Thanu Pillai in 1957 "the dying Fuhrer of a sinking party" is mere invective, not humour. As perhaps the last surviving fan of the Swatantra party, I regret to say that I did not find funny the great Rajaji's declaration - also cited by a reader - that the only difference between China and Russia was about whether to eat the rest of the world as chutney or as sambar.
In the interests of fairness, I should also confess a couple of my own omissions. In expressing my admiration for the extraordinary intellect of Jawaharlal Nehru, I had written: "but dig deep into his writings and speeches and you would be hard pressed to come up with a good joke". Jokes there may not be, but Panditji uttered one classic epigram that I should certainly not have overlooked. Reacting with undisguised culture-shock to his discovery of America after a trip there in 1949, Nehru said: "one should never visit America for the first time". I may also have been unduly dismissive of Indira Gandhi in finding only one witty line to quote from her entire career. Recent events in Agra reminded me of another, her answer to an American journalist in 1971 about why she had refused to meet with Pakistan's General Yahya Khan: "you cannot shake hands with a clenched fist". Both these remarks have the merit of provoking thought beyond the immediate reaction to their cleverness.
But neither, alas, was typical. In his shoddy "Reminiscences of the Nehru Age," the former secretary to our first Prime Minister, M.O. Mathai, cited only one remark of either father or daughter that he found witty. When Nehru and Indira expressed astonishment that Mathai had slept so soundly after the death of his mother, he apparently replied, "that shows I have a clear conscience". To which Indira retorted, "it can also mean that you have none". Sharp enough, but hardly an example of great wit.
If this is the best that the diligent readers of The Hindu can come up with, I rest my case: as far as political humour goes, our national cupboard is indeed bare. I am afraid I told you so.
SHASHI THAROOR
Shashi Tharoor's new novel, Riot, will be published by Viking on Aug 13. Visit him at www.shashitharoor.com
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Know your Rulers- Sonia Gandhi

KNOW SONIA GANDHI
A Visit to Sonia Gandhi's Birth Place By Aravind G 06/02/2003 At 13:47
Yes, I am speaking here of Sonia Maino, the alien, non-Hindu widow of the late Rajiv Roberto Gandhi, hell bent to destroy India's culture, religion and its people. A Visit to Orbassano, Sonia's Birth Place It has been a great tragedy that for the last several centuries our people have been kept in the dark about the true identity of our rulers. I am not speaking here of our common people who, in great measure, have been denied education and literacy, induced to lay down their lives in battles, almost like mercenaries; I am speaking here of our so called educated men who are more eager to know about lesbianism, an Islamic phenomenon, born in harems, than about the antecedents of their own foreign-born rulers.
The thing has deteriorated so much that the entire country happily romps around today, with a foreign born woman of unknown pedigree. Yes, I am speaking here of Sonia Maino, the alien, non-Hindu widow of the late Rajiv Roberto Gandhi, hell bent to destroy India's culture, religion and its people. Did you notice that we are never told about the roots of Sonia, her background, her family, how many brothers and sisters she has, the name of her father, his profession, which town or village she comes from, in small little things that familiarize the people with the self-appointed ruler by virtue of an accidental wedding abroad?

In India, we are not told the name of Rajiv's paternal grandfather or how did the universal uncle Jawahar Lal died or wherefrom did the adjunct 'Nehru' come from! Moti Lal's father's name was Ganga Dhar; why then Moti Lal was not named Moti Lal Dhar? And so on and so forth; we have a great deal of unknowns to discover and be familiar with. I therefore set out to discover myself the small village where Sonia hails from. After some inquiries, I discovered that Sonia was born some 52 years ago in the small village called Orbassano, just outside Turin (called Torino in Italian), in the north of the country, at the foothills of the Alps.)" " The next night I invited the two Italian getlemen to dine with me.

I asked them what they knew about the love affair between Rajiv (il presidente indiano), a Mohammedan boy and Sonia, a thoroughbred 'cattolica' of Orbassano. Didn't her father have anything to say to this inter-faith marriage? I was told that Sonia's father, a simple man named Stephano Maino, used to be a staunch fascist (never mind Sonia's leftist stance today) and supporter of Benito Mussolini, the dictator of Italy then. Stephano was an upcoming party-man at the time. He was among those hoodlums who used to round up leftists and force feed them with bottles of castor oil. This was common at the time, all over Italy. The men would vomit and foul their pants, would be ridiculed in public and punished by long jail sentences so that their will could be broken. And in due course Stephano rose in ranks and eventually was sent to the eastern front to fight the Russians. He was captured and had to pass many months in Russian prison camps where he, for the first time came in touch with Russian women jail-keepers with names like Sonia and Marouchka. It was after his return from the front, after the war was over, that Stephano returned home in Orbassano and sired the two daughters, whom he named with Russian names, Sonia and Marouchka.

He became a contractor of some sort and no longer a party-man; there was no party then! On the subject of the inter-religious marriage with Rajiv, the 'indiano', I was told that Stephano was too angry at first to give his blessing to the marriage. At the beginning, Rajiv denied his Islamic roots and blabbered something on his being a Parsee. He explained how the Parsees in India are very liberal. He cited the names of Ratan Tata and several others, even of those who had married French Catholic ladies without giving up their Parsee faith. The implication was that by virtue of the fact that Rajiv's father Feroz's mother used to be a Parsee woman (and that was prior to her niakaah), Rajiv too could marry Sonia sans relinquishing his Mohammedan creed. The problem that the nitwit Rajiv did not think about is that a man's faith is NOT determined by the religion of the mother and even more so when she changes her creed, just prior to wedding as Feroz's mother had done; she had become a Mohammedan woman at the time of her nikaah with the Sunni Mohammedan Nawab Khan. If Feroz is a Parsee then Pataudi and Ayesha Sultana's (aka Sharmila Tagore) son Seif Ali (the sword of Ali) is also a Hindu. However, Stephano was smart enough to call the bluff of Rajiv, who never has been known to be intelligent. From the BCCI, Bofors and the submarine deals, he has dropped the load everywhere to great dismay of his supporters. (Those who want to know further, please read up M.O. Mathai's books My Days With Nehru and Reminiscences of the Nehru Age, if you can at all procure them today.

There M.O. Mathai (Nehru's P.A. for more than a decade) tells us of Nehru's chicanery fooling the Hindus of India when he announced the Vedic marriage between Feroz and Indira. According to Mathai, that was no marriage at all; such inter-faith weddings between Hindus and Mohammedans were illegal and hence, writes Mathai. Indira's two sons were bastards. India has thus been ruled for so many years by a dynasty of bastards!) But the old fashioned Stephano was not ready to listen to Rajiv's arguments. He said that in order to marry his daughter, Rajiv would have to accept Catholicism and become one. Stephano Maino may not be a Cambridge graduate (but then neither was Rajiv, inspite of all the brouhaha), he did not approve of an inter-faith wedding where his own daughter was a party. And behold, Rajiv became a Catholic. Now, readers! Please remember by this simple act that took place in far away and unknown Orbassano, Rajiv, the grandson of Nawab Khan, the Sunni liquor merchant, became punishable by death! Apostasy is punishable by death in Islam. Measures were taken to keep this information on Rajiv's change of faith quiet. India's Mohammedans did not make much noise for the ante was too high. Sonia came to India as Rajiv's wife, with her father's blessings, but as an Italian Catholic citizen which she remained for decades. She was no burden to her husband. She dabbled in insurance business. Who in India would not run to an insurance agent like Sonia? She was making bags of money in our poor India until the matter was brought to light and such activities were stopped forthwith.

Then Rajiv, still an Indian husband of an Italian wife, willy nilly went on with his air plane second pilot's job until the time came to take over from her assassinated mother. A share of the sins from subsequent mass slaughter of India's Sikhs bothered Sonia and her advisors (like Mani Shankar Liars et al) suggested garlanding of Bhagat Singh's pictures in public for an eventual redemption. However, that did not work as we all know. No doubt this ragazza (girl, in Italian) has come a long way. She had to become an Indian citizen to enable her husband to become the Prime Minister. We know the subsequent incidents and anecdotes. How the wily Sonia was instrumental in the Pope's arrival in India after the eye-wash of a fictitious 'Ganga-cleaning', which remained unclean even after the Pope had left for the Vatican! It was then that the Catholic couple (they had not done so all these years!) started visiting Hindu temples with vermilion-smeared foreheads, in saris and dhoties. Sonia was made the life-time chair-person of the million-dollar Rajiv Gandhi Fund. Money was coming in like it was no body's business. From the BCCI, from the Bofors deal, the submarine deal, while Catholic convents were being built with India's money, some 500 of them, to vie with Mother Teresa.

It was at this time of the post-Rajiv period, this young woman went to Japan (please look up the Soka Gakkai International edition of that year) where she lectured that in the matter of divinity both Gandhi and Nehru were of the same level as the Lord Gautama Buddha. At one stroke, the entire Japanese nation was red in anger. And this is the person who in her big expensive book on the late Rajiv, prepared by a hack-writer under the guidance of Sonia, had stated that her knowledge of India was very limited when she first met Rajiv at that Italian eatery in the back streets of Cambridge. Then she knew India to be only a land of snakes and tigers. She had never heard of Gautama Buddha or of Hinduism or even of Islam! The lady has well-paid and competent teachers. Money has always been abundant; even after she had transferred all those millions of dollars from India to London (one would like to know under which law this could be done and by whose orders?) and after the Baring Bank (where she had deposited all the Rajiv Gandhi Fund money) had turned turtle, one wonders who gave permission to replenish all that lost money in full? Now she has become a past mistress in chicanery, Sicilian style.

Christian Bhil boys rape Christian Bhil women and Hindu boys get the blame for having raped Christian nuns. The false news is broadcast all over the Christian world and our wide-eyed BJP babes-in-the-wood cannot even protest! In faltering Hindi she reads to Hindu listeners that 'the soil of India is as pure to her as the vermilion of her forehead'; that 'she would like to breathe her last only in this land of virtue' and so on and then abruptly turns round, and like an ill-bred street woman starts calling respectable Indian leaders like Vajpayee, 'a liar'! (Afterword: Readers! We have not heard the last of this babe.

Unless our Gods take care of such insult of our ancient nation by this broad, who also is a fraud, like they had done with the entire Gandhi-Nehru dynasty within the span of a few years, she is going to be a nuisance and our people would have to suffer! Time has come for our people to take notice and to watch every movement of the signora, and NOT leave our affairs totally in the hands of incompetent leaders! She has already dubbed Vajpayee a liar; wait till she comes up with choice Italian swear words for us too! )

Editor's Note: This article was first featured on March 8, 1999. URL:: http://swordoftruth.com/swordoftruth/archives/oldarchives/archive.html

i am Hindu by accident (the prime Minister or the Great India for 18 years)

    

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

I Am Hindu By Accident ( because accidently my mother slept with a hindu) --- Jawahar Lal Nehru

(Nehru : The Prime Minister of Bharat Mahan, for 18 years, her daughter ruled for another 18 years, her family is still ruling the bharat Mahan. Long live Hindu’s.)

Without shame to the Hindu’s , the Hindu saints , Hindu Politicians, and Hindu Intelligentsia.
On 14th November each year, we celebrate Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru’s birthday. We think (as we are taught in school) he was a simple and cheerful leader, a person who had a childlike nature, a great politician.But what is the unknown side of our first Prime Minister? An Addict or an Entertainer or a Hindu merely by accident (in his own words)?* Nehru gave birth to the problem of Kashmir & China.* Nehru had illegal relationships.* Nehru hated ‘Vande Mataram’.* Nehru was ready with a sword to oppose Subhash Chandra Bose!Pandit (?) Jawaharlal NehruChacha Nehru… Smoking with Edwina Mountbatten. ..And Nehru’s Birthday is Childrens’ day!The First Prime Minister of Bharat, Jawaharlal Nehru smoking with Lady Mountbatten! An addict like Nehru is not an ideal for the children in any way, yet we celebrate his birthday as ‘Childrens’ Day’! Projection of such a personality by the Congress calls for a Revolution!It would be appropriate to celebrate Childrens’ Day in the name of Maharshi Kashyap who has written Holy texts on Health, based on Ayurveda.Tell your friendsNehru’s ‘love’ for Edwina Mountbatten ruined Nation! - Exposed by Edwina’s daughterLord Mountbatten “used” his wife Edwina, who shared a “deep emotional love” with Jawaharlal Nehru, to influence India’s first Prime Minister to refer the Kashmir issue to the United Nations, according to the last Viceroy’s daughter, Pamela.“That is true and he did use her like that. But he certainly wasn’t going to throw her, he didn’t say to her go become the Prime Minister’s lover because I need you to intercede. It was a by-product of this deep affection,” Lady Pamela Hicks said in an interview to Karan Thapar in his programme ‘Devil’s Advocate’ to be aired on CNN-IBN.Hicks, who has recounted the relationship between Nehru and her mother in the book India Remembered: A Personal Account of the Mountbattens During the Transfer of Power , said it was possible that Edwina’s influence played a role in Nehru’s decision to refer Kashmir to the UN.Source: Indian Express , CNN-IBNNehru’s illegal relationships exposed by his secretaryM. O. Mathai (a longtime private secretary of Nehru) believed, Nehru fathered a son by a woman called Sharda Mata (assumed name) who gave birth to the child in a convent in Bangalore. “I made discreet enquiries repeatedly,” writes Mathai, “about the boy but failed to get a clue of his whereabouts. ” Continues Mathai: “Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was.”Source: ‘Reminiscences of the Nehru Age’ by M. O. Mathai(This book is banned by Congress Government)I am Hindu… by accident - Jawaharlal NehruTo talk of Hindu culture would injure India’s interests. By education I am an Englishman, by views an internationalist, by culture a Muslim, and I am a Hindu only by accident of birth. The ideology of Hindu Dharma is completely out of tune with the present times and if it took root in India, it would smash the country to pieces. - Prime Minister Jawaharlal NehruRef: Violation of Hindu HR - Need for a Hindu nation - III, by V Sundaram (Retd. IAS Officer)(This is the reason for referring Nehru as Mr. Nehru instead of Pandit Nehru. - Editor)Read highlights of true but ‘covered’ history of NehruHindu by AccidentMuslim by HeartContribution to Indian Freedom: Problems of Kashmir and ChinaAim of this seriesNehru’s term as Hindu majority Nation’s first Prime Minister is full of failures and Himalayan blunders. ‘Appeasing Muslims and injustice to Hindus’, was the essence of Gandhi-Nehru’ s secularist philosophy. After Independence, Nehru committed the heinous crime of combining secularism with Western Culture. These ethics and line of thinking of Nehru is Nehruism! To a large extent, today’s writers and so-called intellectuals promote this Nehruism. These so called intellectuals turn a blind eye to the colossal errors in judgement committed by Nehru before independence, after independence, in his personal life and the compromising of the Nation’s security for personal gains. The objective of this article is to make the blind ‘Nehru lovers’ see how supporting Nehruism is leading the Nation to destruction.Jawaharlal Nehru: Hindu by Accident“I do not fear the Hindu Organisations. RSS and Hindu Mahasabha cannot harm me. If there is some danger, it is from Hindu protagonists in Congress”. - NehruRef: ‘Saptahik Sanatan Chintan’, 6th Sept. 2007, Issue 30Nehru put Saints behind bars !After Independence, the great Vedic scholar of Kashi, Pujya Dravidshastri and H.H. Karapatraji said to Nehru and Patel, “We will study the Ramayan, Mahabharat and Chanakyaniti and write the Constitution of the country. Our names need not appear as authors; ascribe the Constitution to anybody. Our Nation will prosper over time with such a Constitution. ” They had a lengthy correspondence on this. I have read the correspondence. But Nehru was not one to listen. H.H. Karpatraji Maharaj had also advised Nehru before the creation of Pakistan, but instead of paying heed, Nehru put him behind bars.. Later Nehru regretted his mistake and released Maharaj. - H.H. Kane Maharaj, Narayangaon.(Nehru’s descendants are propagating his legacy, by arresting Jagadguru Shankaracharya of Kanchi Kamkoti Peeth! - Editor)Criticising Hindus just to prove his own nationalist credentials!During partition, it was Nehru’s favourite allegation that Hindu leaders wanted to create a Hindu rule. He thought that unless he criticised Hindus, his nationalist credentials could not be proved. The Rashtriya Swayam sevak Sangh was infuriated by this allegation. The RSS leaders said, “We have no objection if Muslims are given justice, help and shelter; But what is the need to criticise Hindu Organizations in such venomous terms?” (From: ‘Pathik’, Autobiography of Late Kakasaheb Gadgil)Nehru’s spirituality: His holy places and true holy placesPandit Nehru declared Bhakra-Nangal dam as a ‘holy place of modern India’. People thronged there for the sake of picnic. But within 30 years, the dam has become unusable due to deposit of silt it gathered over the years. The tourists also shy away from the dam. On the contrary the true holy places of Hindus are still vibrating with activity from time immemorial. Lakhs and lakhs of pilgrims are visiting them eras after eras. - H.H. Dr. Jayant AthavaleNehru tried to destroy Sanatan Hindu Dharma and culture!“Nehru was the only Dictator in our country. He declared that his heart would get filled with anger when he looked at Sanatan Hindu Dharma and culture. He tried to destroy Hindu Dharma and culture from their very roots. He brought into existence a secular socialist-democrati c Constitution and Government.” - Gurudev Dr. Kateswami (Ghangarjit, May 2007)The so-called harbinger of Bharat’s destiny and the uncrowned Emperor of Bharat, Nehru often made very irresponsible speeches by pumping his fists in the air, while unleashing hate campaigns against Sanatan Hindu Dharma. In his autobiography he wrote, ”The spectacle of what is called religion, at any rate organised religion in India has filled me with horror, I have frequently condemned it, I would like to make a clean sweep of it. I want to completely destroy this religion and culture. It stands for blind faith, dogmas, bigotry, superstitions, exploitation of the masses and preservation of vested interests.” Anyone with common sense would not utter such reckless words ! - Gurudev Dr. Kateswami (Weekly Sanatan Chintan, 26th April 2007, Issue 13)“Nehru deserves to be punished in hell till the end of Kaliyuga for his great sin of destroying manuscripts, scriptures and books that depicted Hindu progress and affluence !Next only to God, the King of Kings, Jawaharlal Nehru, who had complete control over Bharat decided to establish a world-class University in Delhi on the lines of Harvard, Oxford Universities and spent crores of Rupees on the task. Thereafter, as a part of building of a new nation, (he called it ‘Nation in Making’) without any ancient or medieval history, he established a history department in the Jawaharlal Nehru University. He appealed to the people to send in all the ancient manuscripts, scriptures and books in their possession. Accordingly, the University received a large treasure of these. Nehru destroyed all manuscripts, scriptures that depicted progress and opulence of Hindus.” - Gurudev Dr. Kateswami (Weekly Sanatan Chintan, 23rd August 2007, Issue 27)Nehru government branded Hindu leaders as ‘villains’ while trying to make them accept Muslim leaders as nationalist leaders !“A history department was established in Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU). All the members of the Committee including the Chairman (Mr. Habib) were Marxist in their philosophy. A new history of Hindu culture was written by using the western parameters, which often depicted Hindu culture and history as the worst. Writing on the historians of Marxist colour of JNU, Sri Sitaram Goyal says, “Systematic distortion of Bharat’s history was undertaken by the Stalinist historians of the JNU from their power positions in the Nehruvian stablishment. They insisted that Islamic heroes be accepted as national heroes, while they were converting Hindu heroes into villains” (Ref: How I became a Hindu, Pg. 93). The Marxist histo-rians wrote, “Mohammed Ghori, Mohammed Ghazni, Aurangazeb and many other Muslims aggressors and emperors came to Bharat for upliftment of the lowest rung of the Hindu society. Ghazni destroyed the Somnath temple, Krishna temple in Mathura and lakhs of other temples.He seized the huge wealth of priests of the temples and distributed it amongst the poor from the lowest rung of the society. Shivaji Maharaj, Guru Gobind Singh, Ranjit Singh were all dacoits and rebels.” - Gurudev Dr. Kateswami (in Weekly Sanatan Chintan, 23rd August 2007, Issue 27)Muslim Chief minister of KashmirIn the period post-independence, Nehru was to take a decision on Kashmir. Sardar Patel repeatedly advised Nehru not to make a Muslim the Chief Minister of Kashmir and not to hand over power to Muslims. But Nehru did not budge and Shaikh Abdullah became the Chief Minister of Kashmir. Prime Ministers who have no love for Hindutva have kept alive the tradition of appeasing Muslims with vigour and thus harmed the country. (It is a great tragedy for the country that the first Prime Minister of the country caused great harm to the country! - Editor)Hatred of ‘Vande Mataram’Nehru with Maulana Azad‘There was in fact no need for any discussion on what should be our national anthem; The weakness with which the Congress derided ‘Vande Mataram’ in 1937 came into play in future also when Pandit Nehru pulled down this song of revolution from the pedestal of national anthem. From 1937 when the Congress council of ministers took over the reigns in provincial states, a strange equation was created in the minds of the people that ‘Congress means government’. Pandit Nehru enjoyed unrestrained power like an independent emperor by cleverly adhereing to all the techniques of democracy.(The Russian leader Mr. Khruschev even awarded him a title of ‘Democratic Dictator’!) The situation at least upto Nehru’s rule was ‘what Congress said was law and what Pundit Nehru said was Congress’. These twosomes were responsible to commit the national sin of depriving the song ‘Vande Mataram’ of its lawful place as a national anthem. The song became the victim of Nehru’spolicies on a false ground of music. There are innumerable evidences to prove that Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru had decided since long that ‘Vande Mataram’ should not be made national anthem.’ (’Vande Mataram Itihas Katha’, Author : Shri Amarendra Gadgil).Himalayan blunders of Prime Minister NehruIndians, don’t be foolish enough to call this a martyrdom !The Congress is trying to give a status of martyrs to the Nehru family; But it is a known fact that there were a number of persons who had sacrificed more than Nehru for the sake of the country and played an important role in achieving independence for the country. But today no one knows their names. While in prison, Nehru was given status of ‘A’ class prisoner. He was given all kinds of facilities.Later he became prime minister due to the blessings of Mahatma Gandhi and he ruled the country single-handedly.Nehru’s gift to India: Problems of Kashmir and ChinaIt was the misfortune of India that one by one all the nationalist leaders disappeared behind the curtain of time and Pandit Nehru could establish himself as a hero in the heart of gullible people of India through various means. What what did Indian people get? All that they got from Nehru was two major problems - the problem of Kashmir and the headache of China that took lives of thousands of sons of Bharatmata. Downfall of national ethics, corruption at all the levels of the society and administration, and ruin of national pride are some of the gifts Nehru gave to India.Pandit Nehru declaring ’secular socialist system of governance’ stubbornly and without caring for anyone or anything; but the country being saved due to visionaries like Shri Ramswarup : ‘Indepenence was achieved. Pandit Nehru declared ’secular socialist system of governancne’ stubbornly and without caring for anyone or anything. He also prepared various schemes to achieve the goal. There was not a single week in Nehru’s rule when a delegation of representatives of Russia or China did not visit India. On the lines of the policies of Russia and China, various schemes for India’s developments started taking shapes.
Stategy Against Netaji Subhash Chandra BoseNehru was ready with a sword to oppose Subhash Chandra Bose !‘Bose set out for Germany and Japan with a view to garnering help from outside to gain independence for India. The Second World War was at its peak. He intended to bring into India soldiers from outside and achieve independence. Nehru said, “If Suhash sets his foot in the soil of India along with soldiers from outside, I shall be the first to oppose him with a sword in hand.” (Daily Sanatan Prabhat 22-1-2007, page 2)Nehru adopted a smart war strategy in respect of Subhash Chandra Bose. ‘Nehru had realized that if the strong nationalist leader Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose arrived in India, it would prove costly for his unbridled leadership. He therefore entered into a secret pact with Lord Mountbatten that if Subhas Chandra Bose arrived in India, he would hand him over to the British as a war prisoner.’ - Principal Subhash Welingkar, State organizer, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Panaji, Goa.Nehru’s helplessness in tolerating Pakistan’s refusal to allow immersion of Gandhi’s ashes of GandhiWhen Shri Prakash informed Pakistan’s decision not to allow immersion of Gandhi’s ashes in river Sindhu, Nehru meekly endured the fiasco.(Reference : Marathi book ‘Phashi aani Nathuram Godse’ by Shri Gopal Godse)It was necessary to term the audacity of Pakistan as our national insult. Indian leaders should have vowed ‘to crush Pakistan’s arrogance to dust and take over the river Sindhu’. But it was not done.Nehru made Hindi an object of ridicule and promoted EnglishAs a part of total revolution, Savarkar vigorously pushed for a purification of languages during British rule and did not allow the tradition started by Chatrapati Shivaji to break. But the break came only after Bharatiya Independence! Nehru flatly refused to allow Hindi to replace English in administrative affairs of the Government. The President, Dr. Rajendra Prasad, suggested to Nehru that he should speak in Hindi with visiting foreign dignitaries and use an interpreter. Nehru ridiculed the suggestion. The Congress culture ruled Bharat for 50 years; Islam and the language English were accorded expansive and profound honour and Hinduism and Bharatiya languages were relegated to a secondary status. This is the only dubious achievement of leaders of the Congress culture.- Mr. Arvind V Kulkarni, Senior Journalist, in ‘Purushartha’ , March 2006.Time to think and face the reality….
Posted by Raghav at 2:27 PM
   
addition on 5th september, 2011
------------------------------------

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU’S ANCESTORS/////////////// Father of Moti Lal Nehru; The Story of Gangadhar/////////////// This is the true story of Ganga Dhar (not Ganga Dhar Nehru), father of Moti Lal Nehru. The adjunct 'Nehru' derived from the Persian word 'Nahr' meaning a canal or nullah, was adopted by Moti Lal, who, like all members of his family, had a fascination for alien Mohammedan names mostly in Arabic or Persian. The adjunct 'Nehru' added a Persian flavor to his otherwise Hindu name. That was very desirable for the family, as will be explained later. Otherwise, under normal circumstances, his name would have been Moti Lal Dhar.//////////////// The adjoining picture of Ganga Dhar was obtained from Robert Hardy Andrews' book titled A LAMP FOR INDIA - The Story of Madame Pandit (meaning Jawahar's first sister Vijay Lakshmi, alias Nan.) That book was first published by Prentice-Hall in 1967, a long time after the division of the country. But the fact on the scion of the dynasty, namely Ganga Dhar, had been kept a secret from the Indian public, primarily, the Hindus.//////////////// It is now quite clear, as you will soon see, that Ganga Dhar was an assumed name. The man we now know as the paternal grandfather of Jawahar Lal (son of Moti Lal) was in reality a sunni Mohammedan; in fact he was a Mogul nobleman. The important question is why did he then adopt a Hindu kafir's name? In this case a Kashmiri Brahmin's name?//////////////// The reason has been explained in our previous article titled More on the Nehru Dynasty on our web-sitehttp://www.swordoftruth.com not too long ago. The accompanying picture featured was the same one that Jawahar Lal had referred to when he wrote in his autobigraphy that he had seen a picture of his grandfather Ganga Dhar which protrayed him as a Mogul nobleman. Krishna Hutheesing (Jawahar's second sister) had also mentioned in her memoirs, that their grandfather Ganga Dhar was the city Kotwal of Delhi (an important post) prior to 1857's uprising. Bahadur Shah Zafar was still the sultan of Delhi. It was extremely unlikely that he would hire a Hindu for that very important post. ///////////////// Apparently, some investigations had been made on this count (please see Mahdi Husain's Bahadur Shah II and the war of 1857 in Delhi - 1987 edition) but no one could discover Ganga Dhar's name as the Kotwal of Delhi. Well, how could they? Ganga Dhar's real name then was Ghiyasuddin Ghazi (or something like that) which had been quietly changed to his new Hindu name, just before the English forces entered the city. The sultan had replaced the earlier Kotwal as well as the City Governor Mirza Maniruddin. The latter had been dismissed by Bahadur Shah Zafar on charges of spying for the English. The Naib Kotwal, a subordinate officer, was a Hindu; his name was Bhao Singh. And another Hindu, one Sri Kashinath was the thanedar of the Lahori Gate area of Delhi. Their names were found in the records but Ganga Dhar was missing. Be that as it may, the fact remains that Ganga Dhar indeed was the grandfather of Jawahar and Krishna Hutheesingh. //////////////// And how did he look like? Ganga Dhar had a thick beard which would put even Pakistani president Tarar's beard to shame! Ganga Dhar's thick moustache extended beyond his ears. He used to wear a Mogul cap and had in his both hands a long sword. Does that look like a Kashmiri Brahmin? No, not at all!/////////////////// The Muslim Grandfather of Jawaharlal Nehru /////////////////// Ghiyasuddin Ghazi (the word means 'kafir-killer') looked exactly like a sunni Mogul. Don't they say: 'If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, well, then it IS a duck.' The same was the case with Ganga Dhar, the Kashmiri Brahmin alias Ghiyasuddin Ghazi the sunni Mogul. Only this vital information had been kept a secret from the Hindus of India, like so many other secrets of the family! /////////////////// Our readers! If you can, please read up all references made in the memoirs of Jawahar Lal and Krishna Hutheesingh on Ganga Dhar. True to the last whisker, the picture portrayed on our web-site, does represent a Mogul nobleman, so proudly mentioned by both the brother and the sister. The element of secrecy crept in when it became clear that the Nehrus' Mogul ancestry, if made known to India's Hindu public, might spell trouble for the forthcoming 'reign'. The 'Hindu by accident' got wise to the fact and acted as if he was indeed, son of a Kshmiri Brahmin, Moti Lal Nehru by name. ///////////////// Now, why was it at all necessary for Ghiyasuddin Ghazi to change his name to Ganga Dhar? Dhar is a well-known Kashmiri Hindu surname. Many of these 'Dhars' were forced converted into Islam; their names were then changed to 'Dar' just to distance themselves from the Hindu 'Dhar'. The smart Moti Lal added the Persian epithet 'Nehru' thus making the name sound even more 'un-Hindu'. //////////////// The English army, quite unlike the Hindu army, was made of a different material. While Hindus let the defeated enemy go free (like Prithviraj Chauhan had done and then regretted), the English were after each and every Mogul. They were shooting down all Mohammedans for fear of facing another claimant to the Delhi throne. Panic and fear ran like wildfire among the Moguls. There was nowhere to flee. The city had been surrounded by the 'firangi' forces and their allies, the Sikhs and the Gurkhas. It was then that the wily Mohammedans came up with the brilliant idea of name-changing. Ghiyasuddin became Ganga Dhar, almost like Yusuf Khan who had become Dilip Kumar, many years later. /////////////// Delhi was ransacked. All residents (both Hindus and Mohammedans) had to leave and take shelter under tents set up by the 'firangis' outside city ramparts. For full two months they remained there in the tents (like the Kashmiri Hindu refugees do today). During this time, the English searched thoroughly each vacated home and discovered immense wealth, which was, by the rules of the game, confiscated by the new rulers. A month later, the Hindus were asked to return to their homes. The Mohammedans were allowed to return even later. //////////////// In the aftermath, many Mohammedans fled to nearby cities not yet fully under the control of the English. Agra was such a city. It still had considerable Mogul influence. And Jawahar's Mogul grandfather Ganga Dhar, with his entire family, left for Agra. How do we know that? Jawahar states in his own autobiography that on their way to Agra, the English troops detained Ganga Dhar's family. Ganga Dhar told them that they were not Mohammedans but Kashmiri Hindus. Jawahar explains in his autobigraphy that the primary reason for the detention was their Mogul features. The Kashmiri Hindus looked very much like Mohammedans from Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan and so on. And behold the English let Ganga Dhar and his family go to Agra. The rest is history. /////////////// [Afterword: The unbecoming fascination of the Nehrus for alien Mohammedan connections persisted even beyond the Mogul roots. Please read up K.N. Rao's 'The Nehru Dynasty', Chapter XXIII. Reference is made there to Indira's (falsely described as the wife of Parsi Firoz Gandhi when he was no such thing; he was a pure and simple sunni Mohammedan whose father Nawab Khan was a liquor supplier of Allahabad) letters in the publication Two Alone, Two Together (letters between Indira Gandhi and Jawahar Lal Nehru) edited by Sonia Gandhi. The publishers of this book were London's Hoddard and Stoughton. In that book is featured a letter by Indira to her father, Jawahar and it says: /////////////// "Some months ago when I was at Metheran, Masi (aunt) wrote saying that she had heard from some Parsis that it was written in their ancient book that a Hindu of high family would marry into a Parsi family (here, a 'Hindu of high family' is Indira and 'Parsi' is Firoz, son of sunni Nawab Khan) and their son would do great things - religious reform and so on. Masi asked me to inquire into the matter but it quite slipped my mind. Last evening my mother in law (meaning Nawab Khan's so called Parsi wife, converted to islam at the time of her nikaah) came in a state of great excitement. She had also heard something of the sort, a slightly different version. According to her, the son was the reincarnation of the Shah Behram of Persia. /////////////// "Baby's (meaning Rajiv Gandhi's) patri (horoscope) has arrived. I am enclosing it. It is written in Gujarati but I suppose you will be able to get it read. I am enclosing an English translation of the jyotishi's remarks. I am sending all this registered - please do the same when you return it. The good thing about it is supposed to be that there are five planets in one house," and so on. ///////////////// Quite clearly, the Nehrus could oscillate from the Mogul to the Persian at will as long as the roots appeared to be Mohammedan, alien or home made, and farther removed from indigenous roots the better. May we ask what great things did Rajiv do, other than stealing the Bofors money and jeopardizing the lives of our jawans by supplying them with inferior canon? And what reform was she talking about other than legalizing polygamy among the Mohammedans of India and granting them special privileges to talaaq their womenfolk, sans alimony? No doubt Indira would not move against the fornication-prone Pakistani ruffians when they were shooting down unarmed Bengali Hindu civilians. Some three millions were thus decimated but she had not even lifted a finger until the uproar inside the country became literally uncontrollable. Then again, she let go the 93,000 Pakistani soldiers scot free without exacting a quid pro quo from the enemy. Neither did she ask for the trial of Tikka Khan. And during that time, our jawans captured by the Paki army on the western front, were summarily shot in prisons, against the Geneva regulations. Is it surprising that in Europe today one can purchase picture post cards of Hari Mandir Temple with a comment on the back that Indira had secretly become Mohammedan and that is why she had chosen the Gurpurnima day (when the temple was choc a bloc with women and children) to shoot the pilgrims down, in thousands. And when the 93,000 Pakis left for their home, they had put on weight, were well-dressed and so on. She was some musalmanani of great piety although out of fear for divulging her Islamic roots, she had refused to visit the Kaaba as desired by the Saudi Royal family. Since when the Saudis have taken to inviting non-Mohammedans to visit Mecca?///////////////// Let us not be impressed by the 'five planets' and all such 'bakwaas'. What really happened is in front of our eyes, is this. In a country where they would not even hurt a chicken, there were not one, not two but three assassinations in quick succession. And all three were Gandhis. One was shot by a Hindu, the second was turned into pulp by two Sikhs and the third was pulverized by a Catholic lady of Tamil extraction. In the mean time, the bastard son of Mohammad Yunus (still the custodian of the Netaji Papers), Sanjay aka Sanjiv, killed himself in that plane accident. And the 'sarkari chacha' had died of syphilis, which apparently he had contracted in a local dhaba from a glass of drinking water! Well! Who will believe that? What really happened can only be described as divine dispensation to preserve and protect our 'dharma rajya' of Bharat, that the Congress and the secularists along with the Mohammedan traitors were bent upon destroying for good!////////////// ============================ FOOTNOTE: ASK A LEARNED INDIAN, "WHAT WAS THE NAME OF INDIRA GANDHI'S HUSBAND?"/////////// PROMPT COMES THE ANSWER FROM THE TIMID "COOLIE", "FEROZE GANDHI."/////////// "OH GANDHI? ALL RIGHT. NOW TELL ME THE NAMES OF HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND AT LEAST ONE UNCLE AND ONE AUNT AND TWO FIRST COUSINS."///////////// SILENCE. SILENCE. IGNORANCE./////////// WHY? BECAUSE THEY WERE ALL MOHAMMEDANS OF ALLAHABAD.//////////// TRY AND FIND FEROZE KHAN'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE! OR THE DOCUMENT AT HIS NIKAH!///////// THIS IS PERISHING HINDUSTHAN or "PARTITIONED INDIAN SECULAR STATE" (P.I.S.S.).///////////// 000000000

Answer
Hello and thank you for your question,
    'Jwahyr' and 'Jwahir' stem from the Indian name Jawahar which means a regional leader or king.  We found the following reference to the name Jawahar on a website called Truth Detector and offer it anecdotally;(we're not familiar with the source and cannot make any claims about its accuracy.)
  
More on the Nehru Dynasty

We have received some new information on the Nehrus and would like to share it with our readers. We had reported earlier that the name of Jawahar's paternal grandfather was Gangadhar Nehru. Gangadhar was a police officer under the Moghuls. He apparently used to reside on the bank of a canal (or Nehr) and had adopted the name 'Nehru' as the family name.

It is now reported that Gangadhar was an assumed name. That the man we know as the paternal grandfather of Jawahar was of Moghul ancestry. Why did he then adopt a Hindu, so called Kashmiri name? The reason that was provided to us was this.

In 1857 AD, the year of the mutiny, the British were slaughtering all Moghuls everywhere. The Hindus on the other hand were not targeted by the British unless of course isolated Hindus were found to be siding with the Moghuls, due to past associations. It became customary therefore for many Mohammedans to adopt Hindu names and the theory is that the man we know as Gangadhar had also adopted a Hindu name and thus saved his life by the subterfuge.

In his autobiography, Jawaharlal states that he had seen a picture of his grandfather 'Gangadhar' which portrayed him like a Moghul nobleman. In her memoirs, Krishna Hutheesingh (Jawahar's second sister) has written that Gangadhar was the city Kotwal of Delhi prior to the uprising of 1857. However, a well-documented research work "Bahadur Shah II and the war of 1857 in Delhi", by Mahdi Husain (1987 edition) published by the MN Publications, W-112 Greater Kailash I, New Delhi, the city Kotwal of Delhi during 1857 was one Faizullah Khan. He had replaced the earlier Kotwal and the City Governor Mirza Maniruddin. The latter had been dismissed by the sultan for serving as a spy of the British. The post of City Governor was also abolished with him, at the time. The naib Kotwal at the time was one Bhao Singh. Sri Kashinath was the Thanedar of the Lahori Gate area. The name 'Gangadhar' could not be traced anywhere. Quite clearly, the matter needs further investigation by competent historians.

After capturing Delhi in 1857, the British got the entire walled city vacated. People were housed in tents on the outskirts of Delhi. They made a thorough search of each and every house in the city. The operation yielded enormous wealth which was summarily confiscated. The British also searched houses in the outskirts of Delhi and killed every Moghul so that there were no future claimant to the throne of Delhi. After about two months, the British permitted the Hindu residents of Delhi to return to their houses. Mohammedans were permitted to return later.

The Urdu literature of the 19th century, especially the works of Khwaja Hasan Nizami, are full of the miseries that the Moghuls and Mohammedans as a rule had to face then. They also describe how many Moghuls escaped to other cities to save their lives. In all probability, Jawahar's Moghul grandfather and his family were among them. Jawaharlal also states in his autobiography that on their way to Agra (a seat of Moghul influence) from Delhi, the members of the family were detained by the British. The reason for the detention was their Moghul features. They however pleaded that they were Kashmiri Pandits and thus got away. It is an example how history changes the course of events. Only a few years ago Kashmiri linkage had been used by the Mohammedans of Indian origin to make them look like Moghuls and now it was used to make the Moghuls look like Kashmiri Hindus!

Writes T.L. Sharma in his well-researched treatise "Hindu Muslim Relations, 1913-1925", pp. 3-5 (B.R. Publishing Corp., 29/9 Shakti Nagar, Nangia Park, Delhi 7, 1987), on the authority of Massir-ul-Umara:

"Such exaggerated importance was attached to non-Indian descent during the Moghul period that if Mohammedan aspirants for high government office did not have a foreign ancestor, they invented fictitious ones to improve their chances. Very often they took to marrying Kashmiri girls so that their fair-complexioned progeny might be accepted as of Iranian or Turkish descent...". (Today, in Islamic Pakistan and Bangladesh, well-placed Mohammedans introduce themselves as descendants of Arabs!)
The name 'Gangadhar' thus appears to be a fictitious name superimposed on a Moghul character who might have been a petty official in the services of Bahadur Shah Zafar. The name 'Nehru' raises questions too. If that name had come from the Persian word 'nahr' meaning a canal, how come no other resident of the area had adopted that name? How is it that only Motilal chose that name for his family and no one else?

It is more than likely that after fleeing from Delhi, it was only Motilal who chose the Nehru name and thus abandoned the more honorable 'family name' Kaul. On the basis of the Kaul name, all matrimonial relations were established with genuine Ksahmiri Brahmin families in the future. It is significant that all close connections of this new Nehru family were Mohammedans. Even their kitchen was managed by Mohammedan cooks. Not only that. The Nehrus felt very uncomfortable in the company of Hindus. Jawaharlal particularly abhored the words 'Hindu' and 'Hindi'. And yet this was the man who had been described as a Kashmiri Brahmin to the whole of India! A man who never had worn the 'yajnopaveet', could not read Sanskrit or even the Hindi script!

It appears that both Jawahar and his daughter Indira (there are doubts about Jawahar's having fathered Indira, since he is said to have never consummated his marriage with Kamala Kaul, Indira's mother) were fully aware of their Moghul ancestry. Here it may be said that Jawahar was fathered by Mobarak Ali, a Shia' lawyer of Allahabad and his son, Manzoor Ali had fathered Indira. While Jawahar was removed from that house in the brothel area that Motilal had rented and reared in the palace of the Nawab of Oudh, a friend of Mobarak Ali, Indira was reared in the Anand Bhavan, previously known as the Ishrat Manzil of Mobarak Ali. It may be mentioned here that all male children of the Nehrus', Jawahar (son of Mobarak Ali and Swarup Rani), Rajiv and Sanjay (sons of Firoz Khan and Mohamad Yunus, respectively) had been circumcised following the Islamic fashion.

That explains why both Jawahar and Indira admired the Moghuls and their way of life. That can be the only reason for Jawahar's eulogizing the Moghul period of Indian history (which was meticulously followed by India's Mohammedan ambassador to the US, Abid Husain, during his entire tenure). Jawahar's appointees at the NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training) were all admirers of the Moghul period too. Incidentally, the pre-Independence history books termed the Gupta period (320 - 550 AD) as the golden age of India.

Recently, the former Foreign Minister of India, Natwar Singh has made an interesting revelation about Indira Gandhi's affinity to the Moghuls. In his book 'Profile and Letters' published by the Sterling Publishers, L-10 Green Park Extn, New Delhi 16, extracts of which have been published in the Daily Hindustan Times, Nov. 16, 1997, Natwar Singh states that Indira (then Prime Minister of India), went on an official visit to Afghanistan in 1968. Natwar Singh had accompanied her in his capacity as an officer on special duty of the Foreign Ministry of India. After having completed the day's long engagements, Indira wanted to go out for a ride in the evening. After going a long distance in the car, Indira wanted to visit Babur's burial place. Remember that Babur was the founder of the Moghul dynasty! This visit was NOT included in the itinerary. The Afghan security officials tried to dissuade Indira, but she was adamant. In the end she did go to the place where Babur was buried. It was a deserted place. She went before Babur's grave, stood there for a few minutes with head bent down in reverence. Natwar Singh stood behind her. When Indira had finished her prayers, she turned back and told Singh: "Today we have had our brush with history." No doubt, if Indira had been alive today as the country's prime minister, the slaughter at Ayodhya perpatrated by Mulayam Singh Yadav would have been ten times greater, almost like she had done in the Harimandir Sahib Temple!

Rajiv Gandhi, Indira's son, not so knowledgable in history, Indian or otherwise, was nevertheless quite proud of his Moghul ancestry. Although he used to say publicly that he had no personal religion, and that only his wife Sonia was a Catholic, in personal conduct Rajiv was very much a Moghul of the Islamic faith. On 15th August, 1988 he thundered from the ramparts of the Red Fort: "Our endeavor should be to take the country to heights to which it belonged about 250-300 years ago." It was then the reign of Aurangzeb, the 'jeziya' master and number one temple destroyer.

Our readers! Does all this throw some light on the Nehru dynasty? Sure, it is hard to swallow, but it doubtlessly shows that India has been ruled by this Mohammedan family for the last 50 years. Their success lay in the impeccable guile and perfect connivance, aided by the foolish credulity of the Hindu leaders of India. How long are we going to take such tripe from the cheats and for how long? If only our gods had not intervened and decimated the dynasty wholesale, India today would have been another darul Islam!

-- 

jai shree hanuman,


May lord HANUMAN bring all the health happiness and prosperity to you with family and friends and your country.


Happy Hanuman Jayanti

ashok gupta

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

you can know about HANUMAN Jayanti from following link :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanuman_Jayanti

below is the picture of 85 feet tall vigrha (statue) of shree hanumanjee maharaj in trinidad , i saw 7 months back, there. and below are some links about it :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1XJ58hl6sM
http://www.dattapeetham.com/india/tours/2003/nada_prasara_2003/trinidad_pratishthe/pratishthe_june9/pratishthe_june9.html

and other three photos are of my one hour live interview in trinidad, at radio (power 102 fm) , in programme Soloutions about India and Hinduism taken by - Former Government Councillor and Cultural Ambassador,Mr Harvey Boris. (below is link) : http://www.power102fm.com/profiles/Programs/Soloutions/tabid/209/Default.aspx

Bolo Pawansut Hanuman jee Maharaj ki Jai
7 attachments — Download all attachments View all images

IMGA0258.JPG112K View Download

IMGA0260.JPG110K View Download

IMGA0217.JPG110K View Download

IMGA0218.JPG111K View Download

IMGA0222.JPG109K View Download

bal hanuman.gif175K View Download

hanuman with ram.gif132K View Download

letter of apology by sbi

Dear Team SBIMF,

i have recieved this letter from hindujagrati.

I as a hindu, apologises , for this childish reaction of Hindujagrati people. Actually i want to congratulate the team for this highly motivating advertisement compaign .

There is nothing defamatery in the ad. rather it reminds us of the heroic act of sri hanuman and sri ram.

I have subscribed to this newsletter of hindujagrati as some time wrong , sometime right, at least they are doing something collectively, but there think tank has some different sort of thinking . some time i have written to them, but they are too busy to answer anything.

In my personal view, By doing so , at least every body is reminded of the great act. if it is in a humorous way, what is wrong in this. at least the act is promoted at the cost of a commercial bank. this is the positive side of it.

This is the act of propogation of a relegious activity, where in verse no. 68 and 69 of chapter 18 in geeta jee, krishna says, that the person to advertise for me, is the most dearest to me.

Advertised in this humourous way is more effective than any other thing.

my salutes to the concept maker of this ad and sbi. and convey my feeling to the original persons. that they did a noble , relegious job, misunderstood by some over enthusiast persons. they should have suggested a changed way of the advertisement , instead of condemning it.


this hindu jagriti tells, us of a news , that an activist slapped by a muslim goonda, what hindu jagrati has a solution, but still i praise this society, as something is better than nothing. they are negative in everything, but i am not.

thanks and conratulation on the effort.

ashok gupta
delhi, india

Apology Letter From: partner for life To: pravakta@hindujagruti.orgDate: Sep 19, 2006 5:07 PM
Subject: Sincere apologiesDear Sir/Madam,
We are extremely sorry to hear that our creative has unknowingly been a cause of concern to some people. We would like to sincerely apologize if we have hurt the sentiments of any person and assure you that that there was no intention to hurt anyone's sentiments. As you can check out with our website we have promptly removed the creative.
Sincerely Team SBIMF
Protests Count: 243View list of true devotees protestedRead Letter of HJS to SBI
To,The General Manager,SBI & Societe Generale of Asset Management
Sir,
Sub: Immediate withdrawal of your advertisement of ‘SBI Mutual Fund’ denigrating ‘Ramayana’ and tendering public apology therefor.
With reference to the subject, we have come across your advertisement denigrating Hindu deities, on the SBI website at the following linkhttp://www.sbimf.com/advtcampaign/sip/html/learning_SIP.asp?sip,ndtv,sip_lanka_ndtv_fixedbanner190x200. This is highly objectionable.The said advertisement is a depiction of a part of the Ramayana, which is one of the greatest epics of India. Ramayana is a sacred text, which guides mankind by imparting values that are very useful for conducting their lives. You have used one of the concepts of Ramayana to promote your Mutual Fund. This amounts to commercial usage of a holy text of Hindus, which is highly deplorable. Your advertisement seems to portray that Lord Hanuman is writing Rs. 500/- on a rock and placing it in the sea to build a bridge (‘Setu’). To imply that, money grows in this manner. In reality, the story associated with the above said theme is that, when Lord Rama had to go to Lanka, all the ‘Vanars’ (monkeys) led by Lord Hanuman came forward to build a ‘Setu’. When they started placing rocks on the seawater, these rocks drowned. Later, they wrote the name of ‘Shree Rama’ on each rock and the rocks began to float on water. Thus, the ‘Setu’ was built. From this incident narrated in the Ramayana, the entire Hindu community derives that the name of the Lord is the most powerful thing in the universe. It also emphasises upon the high level of devotion that Lord Hanuman and the ‘Vanars’ had for Lord Rama! Your advertisement has made a mockery of both, namely, the Lord’s Name and his disciple’s devotion as well as this incident from the holy text of Hindus. How can you compare Lord Rama’s name with ‘Rs. 500/-’? Lord Hanuman and the ‘Vanars’, who had no other desire except Lord Rama’s worship, is shown to be accumulating wealth in your advertisement! How dare you insult Hindu deities in this manner!This is demeaning of the holy epic ‘Ramayana’ and the devaluation of the devotion of Lord Hanuman and the ‘Vanars’ so also a insult to the Bhaktimarga (Path of Devotion) and the ‘Naamsankirtanyog’ (The Path of Chanting).So also as this advertisement is placed on the internet it is spread all over the world and thus has caused great insult to the image of Hindu religion and hurt religious sentiments of Hindus all over the world as evident from the complaints received by us.
Would you dare to use deities of other faiths, namely Allah or Jesus in the above said manner to advertise your product?You have hurt the religious sentiments of Hindus. We strongly protest against your anti-Hindu attitude of denigrating Hindu deities, viz. Lord Rama, Lord Hanuman and the holy text of Ramayana. This is a very shocking act on behalf of a reputed Nationalised bank in Hindu predominant country with ‘Secular’ principles. We appeal that you immediately withdraw this advertisement from your website and furnish a public apology for denigrating our beloved deities and holy texts, in order to avoid further inconvenience! If you do not act promptly, it may affect your business! We also appeal that you furnish a written assurance that such acts will not recur in future, from your side.
Yours faithfully,For Hindu Janajagruti Samiti

SBI denigrates Ramayana

The campaign has been stopped as SBI has removed the mocking advertisement from website and apologized within half an hour after this campaign is launched.We thank all protestors for support.