ऐतिहासिक फैसला : published by : rashtra chetna prakashan & charitable trust, dr vanikar smarak bhawan, paldi, gujrat , india

dear friends, 

just today i came across this 8 page booklet 
कुरान के बारे में ऐतिहासिक फैसला
about a court order about the muslims book. 

this booklet as you will see is published by : 
rashtra chetna prakashan & charitable trust, 
dr vanikar smarak bhawan , 
11 mahalaxmi society 
paldi , karnavati ( ahmdabad)-380007.
india. 

but i was not able to find the original court order.  that is why i am pasting it here, so that anybody can show me the original court order.  

i wonder that how the court is allowed to pass such an order ? 

here are the pages from the order : 




2 comments:

Ashok Gupta said...

i am astonished that within the minutes of publishing this posting one of my lawyer friend has given me whole original court order, which i am reproducing below :
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ONE
The Case of Inder Sain Sharma


IN THE COURT OF SHRI Z. S. LORAT METROPOUTAN
MAGISTRATE, DELHI.

State,
Vs.
Inder Sain Sharma s/o Sh. Dewan Chand Sharma r/o
90 Vino-Bha (Vinobha Puri), Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi.
2. Raj Kumar s/o Ishwar Parshad c/o H.No. 67-South Ext., New Delhi.


…Accused

F.I.R. No. 237/83
u/s 295-A I.P.C.
P.S. Hauz Qazi.

ORDER

By this order I shall dispose of an objection raised by Ld. Defence Counsel that no charge can be framed against the accused persons because the 'Ayates' were taken by the accused verbatism from the holy book of 'Quran Majeed' translated in Hindi by a Mohammedan writer Mohd. Farookh Khan and are published in the same form without any addition or subtraction and it was effect which was produced before the public after taking the same from the holy book of Quran Majeed. The Ld. Defence Counsel has admitted that the accused published the disputed posters. The accused reproduced the same before the public not with any malice or bad intention nor he has given any bad opinion with regard to holy book of Quran Majeed and words

1

do not in any way tend to create any disharmony or injured the sentiments of any community, therefore no charge can be framed against any of the accused. The Aytes in the posters at serial No. 2, 5, 9, 11, 12 to 19 and 22 are available in the 'Quran Majeed' and are not distorted in any way. The Ld. Defence Counsel has relied upon the following authorities:-
1. 1977 Cr. L.J. 1606 (at page 1607 Para 4)
2. 1976 Cr. L.J. 98 (at page 112 Para 41)
3. A.I.R. 1957 Supreme Court 620 (at page 622)
4. A.I.R. 1964 Madras 258 (at page 259 Para-6)


In view of the above discussions, I am therefore of the view that there is no prima facie case against the accused as offences alleged against the accused do not fall prima facie within the four corners of Sections 153-A/295-A and hence both of the accused are discharged.

ANNOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT TODAY
dated: 31st July, 1986.

Sd/-Z.S. LOHAT
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, DELHI.
31/7/86.



Footnotes:

1 Translation: It is clear from the above mentioned verses that they carry commands for hostility, malice, hatred, deceit, back-stabbing, war, conflict, plunder and murder. Unless the verses carrying this sort of commands are removed from the Quran, riots cannot be stopped.

2 Translation: These are the reasons for conflicts between Muslims and non-Muslims all over the world. Unless verses carrying this sort of commands are removed from the Quran, riots cannot be stopped.

3 See footnote 1 for translation.

4 Idol worshipper

5 Non-Muslim
6 Hypocrite

Ashok Gupta said...

the system in blog does not allows the full text to be given in comments. so i am saying that , those who want to see the full judgement can go to the following link:
--------------------------
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/foe/ch01.htm